You are here:Home

Dave Raval

Wind power and football on Hackney Marshes PDF E-mail
Written by Dave Raval   
Saturday, 14 November 2009

Dave outside Parliament on a Climate Change marchDave Raval refereeing a match in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 2007

I write to continue the debate on the proposed wind turbine on Hackney marshes. I bring a probably unique perspective on this – in my job I work with new low carbon technologies, creating green British jobs – but as a hobby I am also a football referee – sometimes on Hackney Marshes.

Annie Chipchase, Chair of Hackney Marshes User Group , is right: “Climate disaster is underway and urgent steps need to be taken”. Wind power is part of that and Britain is bottom of the table. Spain for example, a country with less wind than our own, recently produced 50% of its electricity from wind. The UK rarely gets above 3%. We need more turbines and yes, I am in favour of this one.

But Hackney council’s consultation website is short on facts. We’re not given, for example, a list of options where it could be sited (only one is suggested), no evidence on why no football pitches will be lost or even the most basic fact, what is the proposed power rating of the turbine? Moreover, one turbine by itself is just a token gesture. The Liberal Democrats recently surveyed 8,000 people in Hackney and 62% of the respondents said that our council wasn’t doing enough for the environment. We need to be doing a huge amount more than just proposing one turbine before people change their opinion on that one.

For local football, a major problem is trusting the council or the ODA. Plans continually change and promises sound empty. As Johnnie Walker, Chair of the Hackney and Leyton Football League , rightly says “The football community has been dumped on so many times”. So why should we believe this week’s story, when facts are scarce and it’s likely to change next week anyway? The Olympics is not about a few weeks of fun in 2012, it is about what happens afterwards. I personally would be (reluctantly) willing to see a reduction in the space for football before 2012, if this genuinely meant more space and better facilities afterwards. But we only get verbal assurances and 'intentions' from people who have betrayed our trust before.

Whether action on the environment, or improving football facilities in Hackney - few people know for sure what is going on, and even fewer trust the people in power. That's why even good ideas can be treated with suspicion and doubt. If elected, I will work unceasingly to make sure that Hackney gains maximum benefit from the Olympics. But equally importantly, I will make sure that local people know - and can trust - what is going on.

If you'd like to meet me to chat infomally about this, then I will be at the Britannia Pub on Victoria Park Road on 22 November and the Pembury Tavern on Amhurst Road on 26 November, from 8pm on both days.

Comments
Search RSS
Ted of Hackney  - Please think hard about giving up common land.     |2010-01-30 11:57:59
Wind turbines are a very loud statement about 'green' values, but please
think deeply about the best way to go forward with a proper plan
for Hackney people to enjoy a 'green' way of life.

 Please read on.
This is what I believe:

The case for the Turbine is bogus!
Here is just part of the case against it

1) The site for the Turbine is
Common Land, control of land will be handed over to a private
interest energy company or companies.

2)The Turbine could be sited
anywhere else and the energy transmitted by cable to Hackney in the normal
way.

3) A series of smaller turbines would generate the same energy
without dominating the skyline.

4) Hackney Marshes and the greater
Lea-Marshes still provide an experience of a rural environment in
close proximity to very dense housing conurbations. The open horizens
and 'big sky' are a key element of this. A towering structure, combined
with large-scale housing developments through the Lea Marshes will
destroy this
forever.

5) Mental Health Problems are suffered by very
large numbers of people in the borough, and Depression is
now being
recognised aa a much more widespread problem than previously recorded.
Recovery from these conditions along with M.E. and a whole variety
of stress related illnesses is improved when sufferers have the
opportunity to enjoy the experience of an outdoor natural,
semi-rural environment.

6) The leisure and recreation opportunities
of this open space have barely begun to be developed by schools & other
learning groups. A small sample study by University College London in
the adjacent housing estate revealed that children and play-workers have no
experience of, and know almost nothing about 'cost free' types of play
and recreation in natural free-space.

7) While many are content to
use their Motor Cars to take their children to the sea-side or other
wide-open spaces, the people who cannot afford to travel are not being
informed of the benefits that lie on their doorstep. The majority of
Hackney residents know very little about the marshes other than the
football pitches. The council seems content to reinforce this
narrow idea.

The choice between football and the environment is a
cruelly false one. It disguises the take-over of common land by private
companies. It plays on people's capacity to surrender something for
the greater good. For shades of things to come, go to Millfields
Recreation Ground, E5, and see the land grab being carried out by the
National Grid and EDF by their redeveloped power station.



The is a lot
more to Hackney Marshes than football. They are part of the greater
Lea Marshes, a semi rural space with wide horizens and open skies existing
in close proximity to very dense housing conurbations. This space is
threatened on all sides and is about to be cut through by high-rise housing
developments, courtesy of Waltham Forest Council. Wind Turbines are
iconic, beautiful and powerful political symbols, but, just like the Statue
of Liberty, siting and context are everything. This turbine could be
an albatross around the neck of the green movement for generations to
come.

If Hackney schools were teaching children the pleasures
and the meaning of the enjoyment of the countryside, those same
children would eventually be spending more time outdoors and less time
indoors with the heating thermostat at maximum while they play
at 'virtual outdoors' electronic games. This policy would also fit
with the Government 'Horizens' project. This scheme aims to reduce
personal depression among the adult population by ensuring that
children have meaningful emotional experiences.
There are no fast profits
to be had, and there are limited political gains in the quiet
enjoyment of natural free-space; perhaps there are some healthy gains,
though, for the ecology and well-being of our shared world and
a growth in direct knowledge of its precious fragility.
davee8   |2010-03-14 23:13:45
Ted, thanks for your comment. What's your surname by the way? - I don't usually
reply to anonymous posts, but have done this time as it was on such an important
topic.

Firstly, it's worth stating that the environment is one of the most
important things for me. Climate change is upon us and if we don't sort out the
mess our children and grandchildren will suffer the consequences.

A lot of what
you said rings true - the turbine could be sited anywhere, green spaces help
people suffering from mental health problems, etc. Some was factually incorrect,
specifically a series of smaller turbines are not as good as one large one for
producing power in an urban environment - it is much windier the higher you go
and power is the cube of the windspeed - but that is a technical point.

But my
overriding concern is that we, as a nation and indeed as a species, are doing
woefully little to counteract climate change. Read www.withouthotair.com to give
you an idea of the magnitude of the problem. We could put a turbine anywhere,
but other areas' residents also make the same point and, in any case, we need
far more turbines - not picking and choosing the best sites for a few.

Unless
we do something about climate change, the Marshes you love are at a much greater
risk than the one posed by this turbine. So whilst I do agree that one turbine
is a bit of a token gesture by Hackney Council, which could be doing a lot more
for the environment, the need is so great that even token gestures should be
accepted.
Only registered users can write comments!

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

Last Updated ( Sunday, 15 November 2009 )
 
< Prev   Next >